So do you think that he or would or he would not support the idea of a single universal religion as the solution to the question of religious pluralism? Support would be great here.
2. Your reply for how you would argue if god exists was very interesting. I agree that the best approach would to not engage in a forceful argument, however, you seem a lot more reasonable than I probably would be.
I’m curious, now, if you wanted to refute a believer and prove that God did not exist, how would you do it? How do you think you would counter any arguments they would come up with? Has this ever happened to you and what were they trying to argue?